This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
looking for c++ indent
- To: <cygwin-apps at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Subject: looking for c++ indent
- From: "Robert Collins" <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:29:56 +1100
The standard gnu indent is doing horrible things..
i.e.
@@ -97,7 +102,8 @@ auth_retry:
if (code < 200 || code >= 300)
{
- delete c;
+ delete
+ c;
return;
}
Now, I'm of the opinion that second guessing your indent tool is a waste
of time - may as well not have one.
However, I'm quite happy to use a different indent tool, that stays with
GNU indenting rules, but understands c++ well enough not to do the sort
of idiocy show above.
I don't have the time to research a replacement just now, or to fix
indent itself, and it's a low priority - indent is consistent in what it
does, not random, so diffs should be small from now on in.
If someone here can suggest a better indent.. I'll take a look.
Alternatively (preferred actually, but I don't wish to impinge on other
folks time) if someone wanted to hack indent to be c++ aware (ideally
including making things like headers with
#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C" {
#endif
not indent the exported stuff.. that would be great.
Rob