This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers)
Robert Collins wrote:
>>Okay, I've renamed the devel package:
>>
>>libtool-devel-20010531-6
>>
>
> that should be libtool_devel-20010531-6 shouldn't it?
> (devel is a flavour and thus part of the name).
>
> I _think_ that the current upset and setup.exe logic actually starts at
> the right and owrks left, so that teh '-''d name will appear in setup
> correctly, but I don't think we should rely on this behaviour.
Correct -- it does work from R to L. If we cannot depend on this
behavior, then we must rename the following packages:
autoconf-devel
autoconf-stable
automake-devel
automake-stable
tetex-beta
Renaming is a bad thing...are you SURE we shouldn't rely on current
behavior?
--Chuck
- References:
- ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers)
- Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers)
- Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers)
- Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers)
- Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers)