This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers)
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 12:14:24PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Didn't I already vote on this? I can't remember.
>>
>>I say "just do it", too.
>
>I'm waiting for resolution/consensus on the '-' vs. '_' issue...if we
>*are* going to rename auto*-[stable|devel] to auto*_[stable|devel], I
>don't want to have to rename the libtool packages too. I want them
>named "correctly" from the beginning.
I thought that the consensus (i.e., Robert and me) was that '_' shouldn't
be special.
I don't see any reason to rename libtool-devel to libtool_devel, though.
It is only a problem when there is a number involved after the dash.
There are other packages which use dashes in their names.
cgf
- References:
- ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers)
- Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers)
- Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers)
- Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers)
- Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers)
- Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers)
- Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers)
- Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers)
- Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers)