This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: rebasing new packages?!
- From: "Robert Collins" <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>
- To: "Charles Wilson" <cwilson at ece dot gatech dot edu>
- Cc: "Stipe Tolj" <tolj at wapme-systems dot de>,"cygwin-apps" <cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 10:31:48 +1000
- Subject: RE: rebasing new packages?!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Wilson [mailto:cwilson@ece.gatech.edu]
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:28 AM
> I thought that the last time this subject came up, the consensus was
> that Jason's code should go into the cinstall area (now, of
> course, that
> means the setup repository). The standalone rebase.exe
> should be built
> within that project, along with setup.exe which would
> leverage the same
> code.
>
> That way, there's no possibility that the two programs would get
> out-of-sync with respect to the /etc/rebase.conf (?) information and
> file format.
Yes, and at that point we had two issues:
1) We couldn't use libstdc++, let alone the STL. The STL still isn't
available - beyond whats in libg++-3.
2) I think that Jason's design needed some tweaking.
Rob