This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: rebasing new packages?!
- From: "Robert Collins" <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>
- To: "Danny Smith" <danny_r_smith_2001 at yahoo dot co dot nz>,"Charles Wilson" <cwilson at ece dot gatech dot edu>
- Cc: "Stipe Tolj" <tolj at wapme-systems dot de>,"cygwin-apps" <cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 14:00:33 +1000
- Subject: RE: rebasing new packages?!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danny Smith [mailto:danny_r_smith_2001@yahoo.co.nz]
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:58 PM
> Umm, wouldn't the mingwlibs-for-mingw do.
Probably.
All it needs is
a) A maintainer.
b) libstdc++.a and libgcc.a. I found those in mingw-gcc.
> If your just talking about STL in the strict sense, you shouldn't need
> libstdc++.a. The templated STL lives in the headers. That's
> the virtue of
> templated classes. Char specializations for [Non-]Standard
> iostreams and
> string classes live in libstdc++.a but they are not templated pre-3.0
Agreed - but we are talking pre-3 :}.
Rob