This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: new cygwin package: gsl
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>Packaging looks okay to me. For later releases, you might think about
>>re-enabling the libtool shared library support. But for now, the static
>>lib is great.
>>
>
> Could you upload the package, Charles?
Well, I said *packaging* looks okay. However, I object to the setup.hint:
category: Devel
requires:
sdesc: "the GNU Scientific Library"
ldesc: "the GNU Scientific Library, a collection of numerical
routines for scientific computing."
This is not a development tool. It's a library. The category should be
Libs. And, it's a binary not a script, so it requires cygwin. If Teun
makes those changes, then sure, I'll upload...
--Chuck