Re: proposal for GNU emacs 21.2 package

[Robert Collins <rbcollins at cygwin dot com>]

On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 00:48, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 05:46:32PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> > I know its supposed to be part of setup.exe, but with Rob being
> > indefinately tied up, I think this is the most prudent step at this
> > point.
> 
> Actually, I'm suppose to be adding rebase to setup.exe not Rob.
> 
> > So Jason, if you put up a package for rebase, its got my vote.
> 
> Do others share Nicholas's views on this issue?

I'm completely impartial. Well nearly: I think that a separate utility
is a good thing regardless, as long as the config file format is stable,
or easily updatable :}.

Rob

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part