This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
a2ps (Was Re: [UPDATE] Pending package status (06 May 2003))
- From: Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha at cs dot nyu dot edu>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Cc: David_Hudson at capgroup dot com
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 10:49:10 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: a2ps (Was Re: [UPDATE] Pending package status (06 May 2003))
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
David,
FYI, the two comments below are really addressed to the general
cygwin-apps audience, not you personally.
Hmm, first off, the first link below (underlined) refers to aspell, rather
than a2ps (Elfyn?).
Secondly, I thought
<http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00273.html> (the fourth link)
was a review (at least, it was written as such).
If that's unacceptable, what constitutes a formal review? Or do I simply
need to update it for the latest posted release?
Igor
On Wed, 7 May 2003 David_Hudson@capgroup.com wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> How do I get my a2ps package reviewed?
>
> Thanks
> Dave
>
> ------------------
> 13. a2ps
>
> date : 07 Apr 2003
> version: 4.12-1
> status : not reviewed
> notes : http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00155.html
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00254.html
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00256.html
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00273.html
> votes : 3 (Gerrit, Igor and Joshua)
> url : http://mysite.verizon.net/res1xzsj/cygwin/a2ps-4.12-1.tar.bz2
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res1xzsj/cygwin/a2ps-4.12-1-src.tar.bz2
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res1xzsj/cygwin/setup.hint
>
> David Hudson
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor@watson.ibm.com
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty.
-- Leto II