Re: new package proposal: CLISP

[Sam Steingold <sds at gnu dot org>]

> * In message <Pine.GSO.4.56.0309052028340.7348@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
> * On the subject of "Re: new package proposal: CLISP"
> * Sent on Fri, 5 Sep 2003 20:29:45 -0400 (EDT)
> * Honorable Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha=+I05ep9qJbk3uPMLIKxrzw@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 04:57:37PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
> > >I created a new package: CLISP (http://clisp.cons.org)
> > >
> > >ftp://ftp2.cons.org/pub/lisp/clisp/binaries/latest/cygwin/clisp-2.31-1.tar.bz2
> > >ftp://ftp2.cons.org/pub/lisp/clisp/binaries/latest/cygwin/clisp-2.31-1-src.tar.bz2
> > >ftp://ftp2.cons.org/pub/lisp/clisp/binaries/latest/cygwin/setup.hint
> >
> > The setup.hint looks ok other than the fact that putting the '@ clisp'
> > in a setup.hint is redundant.
> 
> Quoting setup.hint:
> 
>    requires: cygwin readline X
>                              ^
> There is no package called "X".  Is this a typo?

should be XFree86-bin.

how do I find out all DLL dependencies?

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k
<http://www.camera.org> <http://www.iris.org.il> <http://www.memri.org/>
<http://www.mideasttruth.com/> <http://www.honestreporting.com>
Despite the raising cost of living, it remains quite popular.