This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: [root: Cron <cgf@sourceware> cd /sourceware/ftp/anonftp/pub/cygwin; /sourceware/infra/bin/cygwin/upset -C -u setup.ini; /usr/local/bin/upx -q -q -q setup.exe || exit 0]
- From: "Abe Backus" <abraham at backus dot com>
- To: <cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:26:58 -0800
- Subject: RE: [root: Cron <cgf@sourceware> cd /sourceware/ftp/anonftp/pub/cygwin; /sourceware/infra/bin/cygwin/upset -C -u setup.ini; /usr/local/bin/upx -q -q -q setup.exe || exit 0]
I'm sorry guys. Thank you for taking a look at the problem Igor.
Chris, I can't figure out what's wrong with the package. It does look like
the package version part of the file names is "2.5.0-4" on some files rather
than "2.5.0-1". Would this cause the external-source problem?
In my setup download directory from mirrors.rcn.net, I have
xerces-c-2.5.0-1.tar.bz2 and xerces-c-2.5.0-1-src.tar.bz2, while the rest of
the archives (devel, doc, and libxerces-c25) are 2.5.0-4. On my website,
they are all 2.5.0-1.
Thanks!
-Abe
-----Original Message-----
> Igor, I wasn't looking for programming help or someone to track down
> an unknown problem. This is a packaging problem pure and simple. The
> source files are missing.
>
> There is nothing you or I can do to fix it. It requires the package
> maintainer to make a decision.
>
> cgf
But that's exactly what I don't understand: AFAICS, in
<http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-02/msg00192.html>, Abe *did* include
a correctly named source package. Didn't it get uploaded? Or am I totally
off the mark?