Re: ATTN Harold Hunt - Re: https no longer supported with wget v1.10.1

[Harold L Hunt II <huntharo at msu dot edu>]

I just got this message today (after receiving almost every other 
message between now and then).  Yesterday Hack's messages and my own 
messages were also delayed by several hours.

I'm sure I'm not the only one...

Harold

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 09:48:47AM -0700, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
>
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > > On Oct  2 20:58, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Got it...
> > > >
> > > > One question though: when you built it, was it statically linking the 
> > > > ssl libs?  When I just rebuilt it, it statically linked them... which 
> > > > makes me think that the openssl install dependency is wrong, since I'm 
> > > > pretty sure there aren't any config files needed from the openssl 
> > > > package and the dynamic libraries, by definition, aren't needed for 
> > > > statically linked apps...
> > > >
> > > > What do you think?
> > >
> > >
> > > I know, you didn't ask me, but I'd prefer if applications are linked
> > > against the OpenSSL shared libs for, hopefully, obvious reasons.
> >
> > Right, I prefer that as well... I figured the preference was shared.  No 
> > pun intended :)
> >
> > What I wanted to know, though, was historically whether wget has linked 
> > against the static or shared libs so I would know if I was missing 
> > something that caused the shared libs to work.
>
>
> While we're debating shared vs. static can we get an announcement for
> the version that's currently available?
>
> cgf