This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [ITP] updated: lighttpd-1.4.8-1 [Was: lighttpd on cygwin?]


On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:37:39PM -0700, Verse X wrote:
> >Lapo Luchini wrote:
> >
> >> Does this means that it fails to load to you as it conflicts with other
> >> DLLs?
> >
> >Yes, but only in certain cases and situations -- not in general.
> >
> >> Whose fault is it? My ld.exe?
> >
> >No, ld still defaults to --disable-auto-image-base.
> >
> >> Should I add a "rebase" in the building script?
> >
> >No, just "LDFLAGS=-Wl,--enable-auto-image-base ./configure ..." when
> >configuring.
> >
> >Brian
> 
> I'm new to this mailing list, and don't undertand what's going on here.
> 
> Did Jan send Lapo some source patches, whereup Lapo built a lighttpd 
> package,
> which he posted to http://www.lapo.it/cygwin/lighttpd-1.4.8-1.tar.bz2 (etc),
> and which people subsequently have problem using because of "ImageBase 
> 10000000"?
> 
> And then Brian suggested that Lapo rebuild with some additional linker 
> flags?
> 
> This is how I sense the conversation went, although I couldn't figure out
> who Christopher is and what he meant by "uploaded".
> 
> My interest in this is simple: I would like to have the lastest lighttpd, 
> with fastcgi,
> working under Cygwin. Using the tarball from www.lapo.it, I can install it 
> successfully,
> but when I tried running it, I get this error ...
> 
> 2006-01-11 23:33:19: 
> (/home/lapo/packaging/tmp/lighttpd-1.4.8/src/mod_fastcgi.c.1209) --- 
> fastcgi spawning
>        port: 0
>        socket /tmp/lighttpd-socket
>        current: 0 / 10
> C:\cygwin\usr\sbin\lighttpd.exe (1072): *** unable to remap 
> C:\cygwin\lib\lighttpd\mod_indexfile.dll to same address as 
> parent(0x3F0000) != 0x970000
>      9 [main] lighttpd 2224 fork_parent: child 1072 died waiting for dll 
>      loading
> 
> If you guys can get this working, I think a LOT of people will be very 
> thankful.
> I know I will :-)

I feel my efforts at watching imagebases in incoming upload requests
have been vindicated now :)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]