This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [RFU] stunnel-4.16-1
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 10:45:44 +0200
- Subject: Re: [RFU] stunnel-4.16-1
- References: <OFC5FB855F.8063BB18-ON852571F0.00360973-852571F0.003680E4@epamail.epa.gov> <OFC5FB855F.8063BB18-ON852571F0.00360973-852571F0.003680E4-65bELFHSwm+NwwpopWmoRw@public.gmane.org> <20061004102931.GC13364@calimero.vinschen.de> <onkai29ovvc95f8avn7ih41h7bo1jjaihl@4ax.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
On Oct 5 14:47, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > > I want to take over maintainership of stunnel, which was abandoned a few
> > > weeks ago. I have a new build ready for upload; URLs are below.
> > > setup.hint hasn't changed. The package layout hasn't changed either;
> > > this is just a point-version update to the current package.
> > >
> > > Please review as needed, let me know if there are any problems, and
> > > otherwise upload. Thanks, Andrew.
> > >
> > > wget \
> > > http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.16-1.tar.bz2 \
> > > http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.16-1-src.tar.bz2
> > > \
> > > http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/stunnel/setup.hint
> >
> > Looks good to me as far as the packaging is concerned. Any chance to
> > provide a shared version of libstunnel?
>
> Yes, I believe so. I'm building it now.
Sounds good :)
> But would libstunnel.so need to go
> into a separate package? I realize that in theory they should be separate,
> but as a practical matter it would be more packaging work.
Your choice as maintainer, really.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat