This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: mktemp and util-linux vs. new coreutils

From: "Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)" <yselkowitz at users dot sourceforge dot net>
To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:01:33 -0600
Subject: Re: mktemp and util-linux vs. new coreutils
References: <479915DB.9000801@byu.net> <479944FD.7070006@users.sourceforge.net>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
| Moving arch to coreutils makes sense to me, but let me look at
| util-linux 2.13 before I commit to anything.

OK, I've built 2.13; let's go with moving arch to coreutils.

Please give me a heads-up so that we can coordinate the updates.


Yaakov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHnP89piWmPGlmQSMRCFPjAJ4kdDz9Ri+2TbGke3kTpQ//kLMypQCg7o9e
kqe3BTv8jENplGcmdEchGz4=
=fxAQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- mktemp and util-linux vs. new coreutils
  - From: Eric Blake
- Re: mktemp and util-linux vs. new coreutils
  - From: Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]