This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?
- From: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 04:45:28 +0100
- Subject: Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?
- References: <51643F10 dot 7000905 at gmail dot com> <87eheixuz8 dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <20130410154730 dot GA404 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <516599BE dot 7090000 at gmail dot com> <51661EA2 dot 1070801 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <51665212 dot 6050101 at gmail dot com> <51665F0F dot 8040902 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <20130411101342 dot GA12461 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <5166A928 dot 8030805 at gmail dot com> <20130411121925 dot GA24666 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <CAF1jjLtESKh6rcOoGsTr-Z=WBAF0Oncr459f3JpbxQKg2FGq7w at mail dot gmail dot com> <5166AE15 dot 6030402 at gmail dot com> <51674903 dot 7050609 at users dot sourceforge dot net>
On 12/04/2013 00:36, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2013-04-11 07:35, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 11/04/2013 13:22, NightStrike wrote:
>>> Speaking of which...... 4.8 is out.......
>
> So is GNOME 3.8.0, but I tend to let others deal with the early bugs and
> catch up by .1 or even .2.
>
>> Point. Anyone got any particular preference whether I go for a 4.7.3 or
>> 4.8.0 release next? Maybe do a 4.7.3 curr: and then a 4.8.0 test:
>> package?
>
> For the same reason, I'd go with 4.7.3 first. But let's not wait until 4.9
> to update GCC again this time, okay? :-)
Yeh, promise!
cheers,
DaveK