This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [Adopt] Iperf package [2.0.13].
Am 07.02.2019 um 14:30 schrieb Battu kaushik:
>>so I am wondering if these two requests are related or not.
Yes, two requests are same. You can prefer my request (As, i have already
discussed with Bob).
I don't see you listed as a project member
Now, it has been added.
I have tested on both archs
x86:https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1IGKvAqB2Dbditb43RYjZ4js6XSdAmmwb
x86_64:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1tyvaczV29n5kT3cH_myXTaCoOP6LiRP4
iperf2013.cygport
<http://cygwin.1069669.n5.nabble.com/file/t11471/iperf2013.cygport>
Thanks,
Kaushik.
the binary packages have no access permission.
The cygport looks fine, it builds with no issue.
But, IMHO, it should be called just iperf.cygport
Tocal test on 64 bit version works.
From my point of view, you can adopt it, as
Joel Johnson has not answered to the request of feedback.
Please see for next step
https://cygwin.com/package-upload.html
Regards
Marco
---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus