This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: FS layout issues for v1.1 (eg., /bin and /usr/bin)
- To: "Parker, Ron" <rdparker at butlermfg dot org>
- Subject: Re: FS layout issues for v1.1 (eg., /bin and /usr/bin)
- From: Chris Faylor <cgf at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 16:33:07 -0500
- Cc: cygwin-developers at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <200003012130.NAA05126@cygnus.com>
- Reply-To: cygwin-developers at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 03:28:07PM -0600, Parker, Ron wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Glenn Spell [mailto:glenn@gs.fay.nc.us]
>> Seems to me that the bootstrapping and build process could remain
>> the same except for one final step of moving or copying a few agreed
>> upon executables from /usr/bin to /bin. I'm thinking that if we copy
>> instead of move then then the mount/symlinks issues will be simpler.
>
><snip>
>
>With the usual caveat of complicating updating to new versions of these
>files. (Not saying one is worse than the other, merely a trade off.)
As I've stated before, my preference would be for something that would
be very close to what you'd get if you did a 'configure; make; make install'
in the top level of a cygwin source installation.
Moving files around or forcing files into different directories does not
seem like the right approach to me.
cgf