This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [RFD]: fcntl call substituting `setmode'
- To: cygdev <cygwin-developers at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: [RFD]: fcntl call substituting `setmode'
- From: Chris Faylor <cgf at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 16:32:40 -0400
- References: <3921AC64.C20AB40B@vinschen.de>
- Reply-To: cygwin-developers at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 10:15:32PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm just using the `setmode' function and I wonder
>if it wouldn't be a nice thing to have some sort of
>fcntl call for that, eg.
>
> fcntl(fd, F_SETMODE, O_TEXT);
>
>and a corresponding:
>
> int mode;
> fcntl(fd, F_GETMODE, &mode);
>
>and -- because it's that nice -- a substitute for
>`get_osfhandle()':
>
> HANDLE hdl;
> fcntl(fd, F_GETOSFHDL, &hdl);
>
>I would like that more than the Windowish calls
>and we could get rid of the io.h file for cygwin.
>Not instantly of course.
Except that get_osfhandle and setmode are both standard methods
for doing things in Windows. They weren't invented for cygwin.
setmode, in particular, is actually implemented on some other systems, I
believe. It's probably a no-op but...
It's possible that your fcntl method actually is implemented that way
in Microsoft-land. Have you checked msdn? If so, we should definitely
implement it.
Actually, I have no problems with implementing this in general but I
just want to make sure that we use an existing interface if one exists.
cgf