Re: Am I using dumper.exe correctly?

["Robert Collins" <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>]

I'm going to do a fine toothed comb look this weekend.
===
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf@redhat.com>
To: <cygwin-developers@cygwin.com>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: Am I using dumper.exe correctly?


> On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 08:49:31AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> >===
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Jonathan Kamens" <jik@curl.com>
> >To: <cygwin-developers@cygwin.com>
> >Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:43 AM
> >Subject: Am I using dumper.exe correctly?
> >
> >
> >> We're using cygwin-1.3.6-6 on our build servers and current
versions
> >> of just about all the other packages.  We get occasional crashes in
> >> cygwin processes during our automated builds, so I decided to debug
> >> them as follows:
> >>
> >> 1) Build the current CVS repository configured like this:
> >>
> >>    CFLAGS="-g -O" configure --enable-threadsafe \
> >>      --enable-extra-threadsafe-checking --enable-debugging \
> >>      --enable-vfork
> >
> >Hmm, I'm not sure that enable-threadsafe has any impact anymore, in
2000
> >we removed some of the thread/non thread options - and looking
closely I
> >think that the removal wasn't as accurate as it could be. Anyway, I
> >suggest not passing either thread option to cygwin.
>
> I meant to mention that.  Maybe we should just nuke the options?
> There's no way that cygwin will work in non-threadsafe mode anymore.
>
> cgf
>