This is the mail archive of the cygwin-developers@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Many pthread failures in the test suite, one setgroup failure


On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 04:42:19PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 06:31:43PM +0400, Egor Duda wrote:
>> Hi!
>> 
>> Wednesday, 25 September, 2002 Corinna Vinschen vinschen@redhat.com wrote:
>> 
>> CV> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 10:16:53AM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote:
>> >> ltp/setgroups01.c: child process exited abnormally
>> >> XFAIL: ltp/setgroups01.c (execute)
>> 
>> CV> Did you check that in the setgroups01.c test:
>> 
>> CV> void
>> CV> setup()
>> CV> {
>> CV>     [...]
>> CV>     if ( geteuid() != 0 )
>> CV>             tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Must be ROOT to run this test.");
>> 
>> This check (and also similar checks in other tests) should be fixed to
>> reflect cygwin's notion of administrative privileges. What's the
>> proper way to check if current process is running under privileged
>> account?
>
>There is none which would satisfy me.  Theoretically you would have
>to check if the process token has the needed user rights "Act as part
>of the operating system", "Create process level token", "Replace a
>process level token".  And ntsec should be on.
>
>OTOH, cron only asks for uid 18...

I'd be satisfied with removing the check altogether if that is the best
we can do.  So, we'll have to live with one FAIL in cases where the
test is run without privileges.

OTOH, I noticed a new XPASS in this run.  I don't know if this is an
anomoly or not.

cgf


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]