This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [PATCH] performance patch for /proc/registry
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 04:08:45PM -0500, Joe Buehler wrote:
> $ ls -l /proc/registry
> total 0
> dr-xr--r-- 1632 Administ ???????? 0 Jul 25 1996 HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT
> dr-xr--r-- 2 Administ ???????? 0 Oct 10 1996 HKEY_CURRENT_CONFIG
> dr-x------ 8 Administ ???????? 0 Dec 5 2001 HKEY_CURRENT_USER
> dr-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 0 Mar 25 15:53 HKEY_DYN_DATA
> dr-xr-xr-- 5 Administ system 0 Mar 24 10:31 HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE
> dr-xr-xr-x 0 0 0 0 Dec 31 1969 HKEY_PERFOMANCE_DATA
> dr-xr-xr-- 3 Administ system 0 Mar 24 10:31 HKEY_USERS
> $
>
> Are those permissions correct? They are same as /proc/registry without
Dunno. In RegEdit I can see the DACL, but no ownership. We have to
trust the values returned by the appropriate system functions I guess ;-)
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin at cygwin dot com
Red Hat, Inc.