This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: key64_t? ino64_t?
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 02:36:44AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> What do you think of the attached patch? (The comments explain my
> rationale).
Except that you mistyped my name, the idea is fine. We should remove
the old implementation entirely. I don't want to see the
__CYGWIN_USE_BIG_TYPES__ macro used in the Cygwin sources. They should
always be type clean and not behave differently dependent of the setting
of __CYGWIN_USE_BIG_TYPES__. Either we provide ftok and ftok64 or we
just replace ftok. Since ftok wasn't exported at all, I'm voting for
just using the new implementation.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.