This is the mail archive of the cygwin-developers@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 1.5.12

From: Christopher Faylor <me at cgf dot cx>
To: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:39:20 -0400
Subject: Re: 1.5.12
References: <20041008145156.GA3844@tishler.net> <20041006210749.GA2697@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20041006210749.GA2697@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <3.0.5.32.20041026233550.00824dc0@incoming.verizon.net>
Reply-to: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com

On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 11:35:50PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>Question: Are there any objections to using NULL instead to indicate
>that the tokens do not exist?

Personally, I like NULL tests because they're cheap so no objections
from me.

In Corinna's absence, you're our remaining expert in this area, so
please just check in what you think is best.

cgf

References:
- Re: 1.5.12
  - From: Jason Tishler
- 1.5.12
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- Re: 1.5.12
  - From: Pierre A. Humblet

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]