This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: RFC: Cygwin 64 bit?
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 13:05:20 -0400
- Subject: Re: RFC: Cygwin 64 bit?
- References: <20110628193302.GK9552@calimero.vinschen.de> <4E0A30AD.10705@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <4E0A3272.705@towo.net> <4E0A39AA.4030105@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <4E0A3B44.80500@towo.net> <20110628204232.GQ9552@calimero.vinschen.de> <4E0A4946.50509@cs.utoronto.ca> <4E0A4B7D.9050802@towo.net> <20110629065652.GR9552@calimero.vinschen.de> <4E0B2C99.8080208@cs.utoronto.ca>
- Reply-to: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:46:01AM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote:
>Finally, such a change would make cygcheck rather less than useful.
>Maybe we'd need a special section containing the names of all
>"cygwin-static" dlls which cygcheck knew how to read? Or does cygcheck
>actually execute the process far enough to see what it loads?
cygcheck doesn't but ldd does.
cgf