This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: Mouse support
- To: "'cygwin-patches at cygwin dot com'" <cygwin-patches at cygwin dot com>
- Subject: RE: Mouse support
- From: "Town, Brad" <btown at ceddec dot com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 11:35:15 -0500
Yeah, this morning (Friday), CVS choked on my changes, too. Attached are
some good patches that do the trick.
Brad Town
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
> [mailto:cygwin-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com]On Behalf Of
> Christopher
> Faylor
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 11:43 PM
> To: 'cygwin-patches@cygwin.com'
> Subject: Re: Mouse support
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 12:35:52PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 10:48:12AM -0500, Town, Brad wrote:
> >>Attached is a patch to fhandler_console.cc that allows enabling and
> >>disabling the mouse based on ^[[?1000h/l. It's not
> perfect, but it works
> >>well. Included is a ChangeLog entry.
> >>
> >>Also, terribly minor point: It seems that the mouse code I
> submitted has
> >>been included in the CVS sources, but my ChangeLog entry hasn't yet
> >>appeared.
> >
> >Sorry. That was a mistake. I'll revert the code until I
> have a chance to
> >analyze your new patch.
>
> Apologies again, Brad, but I had problems applying your
> patch. It didn't
> seem to install cleanly to the current CVS version.
>
> I've reverted the changes that I unintentionally applied and have
> checked in a fresh version of fhandler_console.cc. I've added some
> crude understanding of when a '<ESC>[?' is detected. Could you adapt
> your changes to use that and submit everything all over
> again, including
> an up-to-date changelog?
>
> When you do that, I'll check everything in.
>
> Thanks,
> cgf
>
>
fhandler_console.cc.diff
select.cc.diff
ChangeLog.mouse