Need setup.exe testers

[Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>]

Can someone try these patches out and verify that they work as
advertised?

As I've previously implied, I don't want to be in the position of
supporting setup.exe.  I'd appreciate some community involvement.

cgf

On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:14:43PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> 
>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 04:57:34PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>> >Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >> >There are other 's too but since this is a very simple
>> >> >program I dont think its worth discussing.
>> >>
>> >> ChangeLog?
>> >
>> >No - something like description ... perhaps .. Actually
>> >the idea behind the patch is to remove the the behaviour
>> >described like "setup.exe going to background".
>> 
>> We need a ChangeLog with patches.  See http://cygwin.com/contrib.html
>> 
>> cgf
>
>Ok :)
>
>* geturl.cc (init_dialog): Remove usage of SetForegroundWindow.
>This prevents the progress dialog to gain control over the 
>application and fixes the "setup.exe going to background" problem.
>(is_local_install): New static variable. Controls whether the
>progress dialog and the supporting thread will be created.
>
>* install.cc (init_dialog): Remove usage of SetForegroundWindow.
>This prevents the progress dialog to gain control over the 
>application and fixes the "setup.exe going to background" problem.

-- 
cgf@cygnus.com                        Red Hat, Inc.
http://sources.redhat.com/            http://www.redhat.com/