This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
mailing list for the cygwin project.
cygwin.com up again (Was Re: cp command - problem with sparse [sparsefile support under NTFS (Win2k)])
- From: Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha at cs dot nyu dot edu>
- To: Talk Amongst Yourselves <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 03:01:07 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: cygwin.com up again (Was Re: cp command - problem with sparse [sparsefile support under NTFS (Win2k)])
- References: <20050202112102.GI7084@cygbert.vinschen.de><EGECIPGBMFENJDOHIEMIIEMNCBAA.eicher_und_bergmann@yahoo.de><loom.20050202T175049-880@post.gmane.org> <20050203200719.GB3340@efn.org><Pine.GSO.4.61.0502060256490.3910@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
- Reply-to: Talk Amongst Yourselves <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Reply-to: Talk Amongst Yourselves <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>
> > [snip]
> > Oh, dear. He gave away a reason we ask for cygcheck output: that we
> > don't trust people to have the version they think (and say) they do.
> >
> > It's really important to keep people in the dark on this, so they just
> > follow orders, and don't try to say they already gave all the
> > necessary information. Is there a way to expunge this message from
> > the archives?
> >
> > Here are some suggestions for variant phrasing of the uncompromising
> > demand, for those who get bored with the same old same old.
> > [snip suggestions]
> > Other suggestions?
>
> Why don't we go with the standard one: "don't make us hack into your
> system -- please attach the output of 'cygcheck -svr'"?
> Igor
P.S. It's good to see the cygwin site back up. WTF happened?
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor@watson.ibm.com
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"The Sun will pass between the Earth and the Moon tonight for a total
Lunar eclipse..." -- WCBS Radio Newsbrief, Oct 27 2004, 12:01 pm EDT