This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: Qestion about Bash Fork Resource Temporily Unavailable for NS2.28 and NS2.27
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 08:28:12 -0400
- Subject: Re: Qestion about Bash Fork Resource Temporily Unavailable for NS2.28 and NS2.27
- References: <6.2.1.2.0.20050705223027.08ca8288@pop.prospeed.net> <20050706062832.63358.qmail@web30112.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <6.2.1.2.0.20050706111849.08d26298@pop.prospeed.net> <20050708032931.GA2392@efn.org> <20050708035619.GC2123@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20050708060042.GB3200@efn.org>
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:00:42PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:56:19PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 08:29:31PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>> >On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:27:15AM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
>> >> I said "virus program". That would be something like
>> >> Norton AV, McAfee VirusScan, etc.
>> >
>> >Hmm, is there any way cygcheck could report on intrusive software like
>> >virus scanners and firewalls? Though my knowlege on the subject is
>> >close to nil I think the latter may be doable with WSCEnumProtocols.
>>
>> You may be onto something here.
>>
>> We could even run cygcheck as a background process looking for the
>> installation of virus scanners and popping up warnings when a virus
>> scanner was introduced. If someone was interested, we could maintain
>> an active database of virus scanners which would be updated over the
>> internet.
>>
>> A future project might entail linking cygcheck to email clients, scanning
>> them for virus scanner attachments and "quarantining" them. We could
>> also add a "virus scanner" hook for IE which would detect attempts by
>> users to download rogue virus scanners to their systems.
>>
>> If it helps, I could add a cygwin-virus-scanner mailing list devoted to
>> "first alert" sightings of virus scanners "in the wild".
>>
>> This could be big.
>
>LOL. Glad you liked the idea.
Actually, I did like the idea. I think that having cygcheck report on virus
scanners would be a big help.
cgf