This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: -mno-cygwin, huh?, wha? [RE: Pbm with ar.h when compiling make-3.80 for mingw]
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:35:22 -0500
- Subject: Re: -mno-cygwin, huh?, wha? [RE: Pbm with ar.h when compiling make-3.80 for mingw]
- References: <20060215192647.GJ4169@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <006d01c63266$70f18fd0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
- Reply-to: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 07:31:38PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>On 15 February 2006 19:27, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Thanks, Dave, for your continued vigilance.
>>
>>Is there something (besides hippos) in the water or something? We seem
>>to be getting an increased number of non-cygwin "problem reports"
>>recently.
>
>
>Yeh, I've noticed, the situation looks real bad.
>
>In fact you might even say it mings!
I wonder if it would matters at all if we just got rid of the
-mno-cygwin option entirely. I don't mind making a mingw
"cross-compiler" part of the requirement for building cygwin and maybe
it would make the issue really clear.
cgf