This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
RE: FW: allow read into untouched noreserve mappings
- From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
- To: "'only three more silly cygwin hippo references until beer o'clock!'" <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:54:22 +0100
- Subject: RE: FW: allow read into untouched noreserve mappings
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On 19 July 2006 17:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 19 17:49, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 19 July 2006 17:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>
>>> shouldn't be as intransparent
>>
>> "opaque" :) JFYI!
>
> It was on the tip of my tongue... er..., no, restart.
>
> I had it in my fingertip but it just didn't came out. And I was too
> lazy to look in to the dictionary, given the heat and all.
>
> And then again, intransparent is as valid as opaque and it's also in
> the dictionary.
Well, yes, of course, everyone knows that nonintransparent == unopaque ....
;)
> MAY A THOUSAND HIPPOS FALL ON YOU FOR HAVING ME LOOKING INTO THE
> DICTIONARY NOW!
I couldn't possibly imagine a better way to get the weekend off to a
falling^W flying start!
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....