This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: make 3.81-1 problems with DOS-paths
- From: Charli Li <KBarticle889459 at aim dot com>
- To: "This is just pathetic!" <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:38:33 -0400
- Subject: Re: make 3.81-1 problems with DOS-paths
- References: <451AB554.3020805@web.de> <451B2561.60804@byu.net>
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Eric Blake just had to cough out the following stream of bytes from
the specified email client, on 9/27/2006 9:29 PM:
> According to Knut Schwichtenberg on 9/27/2006 11:31 AM:
>> How is it possible that ./configure does not recognize the Cygwin
>> environment properly for a Windows-PC? Is the missing define only a
>> derived problem that is based on an error in the toolchain before?
>
> All right! I was totally expecting this week's holy war to be on my
> decision to make bash run faster on binary mounts at the expense of those
> poor \r\n script users, but this guy set out to prove me wrong. Perhaps
> he didn't get the memo that make is last week's gripe?
>
Heh, heh, maybe the patch proposed *should* be considered official.
> [Goes on reading \my inbox]
> Oh, well, maybe I did spark a holy war after all. The hippo should be so
> proud.
>
> Next week: how about vi and/or emacs vs. notepad?
>
Throw xemacs and Notepad++ in there, would you? And yes, the hippo
should be proud of this *possibly upcoming* debate of text editors!?
- --
Charli
- ---
Leave? Yeah, get out! *smack*
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFGyeZKGyf4JaPChgRAtlLAJ0S32FVGTRWH23oaCscehlzSzjwbACfTmy4
qNvvqk7pgbf6VfpfbQxOYEs=
=HYok
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----