This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: buildrrot compoilatio
- From: "Robert Pendell" <shinji at elite-systems dot org>
- To: "The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List" <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:20:31 -0400
- Subject: Re: buildrrot compoilatio
- References: <78aeb6ba0706182244j6f0fe49dh151f8b4427c8e433@mail.gmail.com> <78aeb6ba0706182246v5caac59ma4e9df6258330ae8@mail.gmail.com> <04c801c7b252$4751e400$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <20070619093707.GC21181@calimero.vinschen.de> <f58p4c$qgd$1@sea.gmane.org>
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On 6/19/07, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jun 19 10:14, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 19 June 2007 06:47, ICE wrote:
>>> Has n e one done a successful compoilation of buildroot
on cygwin
>>> pls help
>>> the error i get is
>>> "
>>> $ make
>> u hv 2 prbs:
>> [...]
>> ur xcmplr is nt nstld prply
>> [...]
>> n u nd -lintl fr ntv blds.
>
> u r 2 hlpfl.
>
> Is there any good reason to violate written language so
much?
GIGO principle? ;-)
(I found this rather hilarious :-D... And maybe next time
the OP will
take a little more care with their grammar.)
--
Matthew
"Five is right out!"
-- Cleric (from Monty Python's Quest for the Holy Grail)
Yes indeed. I actually never find a need for that type of
shorthand writing when sending messages via a cell phone.
Therefore it is completely unnecessary. He could of taken a
couple more minutes to key in the entire word.
- --
Robert Pendell
shinji@elite-systems.org
PGP Key: 41B2 C5E8 4203 300D FEC9 4E1B 5336 7246 AEB7 040B