This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: Bug tracker
- From: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com>
- To: ok thunderbird thats the third time you just magically deleted this header and now i am getting bored with retyping it <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 03:07:20 +0100
- Subject: Re: Bug tracker
- References: <4C6D17E0.5010506@blunn.org> <8cdq66dd6mang9d5oseab1v7l20io5epmi@4ax.com> <20100819141948.GB19001@calimero.vinschen.de> <cmfq66p4d2s88u1foj5s7d13ucg2oda29i@4ax.com> <20100819144931.GD19001@calimero.vinschen.de> <pphq66ptach2iki3bhqb9rp4s46f7g5si6@4ax.com> <4C6D559B.4030108@bopp.net> <20100819173439.GC9090@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4C6D8D33.5070902@bopp.net> <4C6D8FD7.4090506@redhat.com> <20100819202648.GC9840@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
- Reply-to: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On 19/08/2010 21:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 02:11:03PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 08/19/2010 01:59 PM, Jeremy Bopp wrote:
>>> Of course the quality of the defect tracker is directly related to the
>>> effort the maintainers put in to keep it relatively pruned and
>>> organized. Maybe that is too much to expect for most maintainers at
>>> this time.
>> Bingo. That's why I'm perfectly happy with mailing lists and no extra
>> burden of a web-based tracker for the packages I maintain on my spare
>> time. Why add overhead to a process that already works for me?
>
> Feelthy steenking luddite. You're admitting that you're satisfied with
> mediocrity! You probably torture small animals too, just like Dave.
>
> cgf
But I both torture small animals and like bug trackers! And I don't even
care if that is a double-standard!
cheers,
DaveK