This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: snapshots revisited
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:44:38 -0500
- Subject: Re: snapshots revisited
- References: <20110310080923.19244yp07upxphcz@messagerie.si.c-s.fr> <20110310091353.GU12899@calimero.vinschen.de> <20110310232423.GA3588@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20110310232514.GA10198@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20110311082012.GE7064@calimero.vinschen.de> <20110311152511.GB4645@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <COL102-W10B426004D410A3549CE47B5CB0@phx.gbl> <AANLkTinC6ba03h4dk7M=wZD-ZF=kXFBwqOj9NuV-0CC6@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTim+WXCg-ddYHw1DXu-NTkDs0n121gkPzpBU7Uzk@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Reply-to: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 04:17:55PM +0000, Andy Koppe wrote:
>Please let the matter rest now and go back to testing snapshots.
Actually, not to be technical in cygwin-talk but the last problem I
found with the pipe code is, so-far, a show-stopper. This is, I think,
the first time I've seen a Windows function somewhat succeed but still
return an error code. I don't know how to deal with that yet.
cgf