Re: RFC: linux compatibility

[Chris Faylor <cgf at cygnus dot com>]

On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 11:20:53AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 11:20:53 +0200
>From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@cygnus.com>
>Reply-To: cygwin <cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
>To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com
>Subject: Re: RFC: linux compatibility
>
>Chris Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 04:59:11PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>> >What about the "Single Unix Specification" at Opengroup
>> 
>> I actually have been using the documents at this site as the basis for
>> most of the work I do for Cygwin.
>> 
>> When they don't mention a feature, I usually use Linux.  Unfortunately,
>> it's not Red Hat linux, specifically.  Instead it is the cgf linux
>> distribution (tm) that I've built up over the years.
>
>That's my favorite order. SUS first, Linux if something is missing in SUS
>and as last resort Commodore 64. Uh, oh, forget the last one...

That's right.  Commodore 64?  TRS-80 rules!

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com