This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: question about cygwin terminal type
- To: Thomas Dickey <dickey at herndon4 dot his dot com>
- Subject: Re: question about cygwin terminal type
- From: Neil Zanella <nzanella at cs dot mun dot ca>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 05:10:36 -0330 (NST)
- cc: Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>, ncurses <bug-ncurses at gnu dot org>
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> That's probably incorrect (cygwin's terminal emulator differs in several
> features that are normally in "ansi"), and is likely done to make it simple to
> setup on the remote host. Just to satisfy my own curiousity I'll retest cygwin
> against "ansi" and see if I missed anything when making that terminfo entry.
Thanks. Too bad I can't make that terminal a little bit wider. That's
probably a limitation in Windows' shell client and I bet you they
did it on purpose. With Win2K you can maximize it vertically but you
still can't maximize the window horizontally.
> SIGWINCH isn't related to the $TERM value (it's whether or not your
> host supports the negotiations about window size)
Does Win2K support SIGWINCH?
Thanks,
Neil
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com