This is the mail archive of the cygwin@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd

To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
Subject: Re: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd
From: Bob McGowan <rmcgowan at veritas dot com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:42:04 -0800
Organization: VERITAS Software
References: <OFF186A1CB.218CF568-ON862569D6.0076B70D@RCHLAND.IBM.COM> <3A64D197.514DD0FA@veritas.com> <20010116200443.A10173@redhat.com>

My apologies for failing to do an exhaustive archive search before responding.

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 02:56:23PM -0800, Bob McGowan wrote:
> >Based on the man page for 'pwd':
> >
> > "...That is, all components of the printed name will be actual
> >  directory names -- none will be symbolic links."
> >
> >I'd say this is a bug.
> 
> I'd say that this has been discussed in the mailing list several times
> already.
> 
> cgf
> 
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

-- 
Bob McGowan
Staff Software Quality Engineer
VERITAS Software
rmcgowan@veritas.com

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

References:
- /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd
  - From: Fred Kulack
- Re: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd
  - From: Bob McGowan
- Re: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd
  - From: Christopher Faylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]