This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: help: Glib under Cygwin
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Subject: Re: help: Glib under Cygwin
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 22:08:02 -0400
- References: <E1B42CFD544FD31193EE0000E87C5CE799B4CF@mailserver2.mqsoftw are.com> <5.0.2.1.0.20010416214552.009f4ec0@mail>
- Reply-To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 09:50:17PM -0400, David A. Cobb wrote:
>At Friday 10:31 AM 4/6/01, Glen Coakley wrote:
>
>>What version are you trying to compile? When I attempt to 'configure' glibc
>>2.2.2 I get the follow message:
>>
>>
>>$ configure
>>loading cache ./config.cache
>>checking host system type... i686-pc-cygwin
>>*** The GNU C library is currently not available for this platform.
>>*** So far nobody cared to port it and if there is no volunteer it
>>*** might never happen. So, if you have interest to see glibc on
>>*** this platform visit
>>*** http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/porting.html
>>*** and join the group of porters
>
>Well, that's nice. I had the chutzpah to suggest I would like to take a look
>at that. And one Ulrich Drepper of Redhat went positively ballistic. I won't
>quote his reply but it was entirely unfriendly. Obviously Redhat is a diverse
>organization with many divergent interests.
>
>I have enough problems without needing to swim against that sort of current.
Um, yeah, Ulrich is not a Windows lover, to put it mildly. He's hardly alone
at Red Hat, though.
I wasn't around during Cygwin's inception but I believe that Cygwin
actually exists because Ulrich was adamant about not porting glibc to
Windows.
However, aren't we talking about 'glib' not 'glibc'?
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple