This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

setup


>From J.L.Moxham@maths.soton.ac.uk Sat Sep 15 20:34 BST 2001
Received: from malus.maths.soton.ac.uk (malus.maths.soton.ac.uk [152.78.40.173])
	by midwife.maths.soton.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA16525;
	Sat, 15 Sep 2001 20:34:25 +0100 (BST)
From: Jason Moxham <J.L.Moxham@maths.soton.ac.uk>
Received: (from jlm@localhost)
	by malus.maths.soton.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id UAA26603;
	Sat, 15 Sep 2001 20:34:24 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200109151934.UAA26603@malus.maths.soton.ac.uk>
Subject: setup
To: cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 20:34:24 +0100 (BST)
Cc: j.l.moxham@maths.soton.ac.uk
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Length: 549



I have a dll problem which I think might be fixed by the latest binutils
, so I tryied to find a mirror  which had the latest .

While I was going thru each mirror to see which has the update I noticed
that some of them had an older version of "setup" , which when run gave
incorrect "new" packages  , perhaps these sites should be taken off the
mirrors list , you do get a warning about it being an older version of
setup , but that shouldn't affect what pakages are considered "newer" ,
should it?



Jason Moxham
j.l.moxham@maths.soton.ac.uk




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]