Re: Help!Unable to compile 1.3.22-1 sources

["Vishal Jain" <vxj45 at hotmail dot com>]

Thanks for looking into the problem.
We need to get a stable version of cygwin to start with. Hence
getting latest from CVS is not a good idea.
Vishal




> From: "Max Bowsher" <maxb at ukf dot net>
> To: "Vishal Jain" <vxj45 at hotmail dot com>,<cygwin at cygwin dot com>
> Subject: Re: Help!Unable to compile 1.3.22-1 sources
> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 22:19:49 +0100
>
> Vishal Jain wrote:
> > Hi,
> > If I use this tag, w32api-2_2, which cygwin release will it correspond 
> to?
> > Is it ok to use this tag?
>
> No.
>
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Hi,
> > I am unable to compile 1.3.22-1 sources. It is failing while compiling
> > utils.
> > I have 2.3.1 w32api package sources which I believe is the latest.
>
> Yes, latest. BTW, the version is 2.3-1. Yes, I can figure out what you 
> mean,
> but its still best to be correct.
>
> > Which version of w32api package shall I use?
> >
> > Is there a CVS label I can use to get 1.3.22-1 sources which are in sync
> > with w32api so that I can do a build.
>
> There are no public use CVS tags for Cygwin releases. Any tags you may find
> with CVSweb are private-use for the person preparing releases, and do not
> correspond exactly to the source tarball.
>
> I'm not quite sure what is failing. I'm downloading the source tarball now.
>
> When I need to build Cygwin, I usually build cvs HEAD. That's probably not 
> a
> great idea at the moment, though, as the trunk is in the midst of the great
> 32/64 enablement.
>
> Max.


_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/