This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gcc version : 3.2 or 3.2-3 ?


On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 06:47:55PM +0300, Alex Vinokur wrote:
>"Max Bowsher" <maxb at ukf dot net> wrote in message news:006701c30e43$07449a40$78d96f83 at pomello dot  dot  dot 
>> Alex Vinokur wrote:
>> > gcc -v indicate version 3.2 but not 3.2-3 (!?)
>>
>> Ugh, this is becoming a FAQ.
>>
>> 3.2-3 means VERSION = 3.2, CYGWIN-SPECIFIC-RELEASE = 3
>>
>> No packaging system that I know of attempts to insert its release number
>> into the version output of executables.
>
>For instance, DJGPP :
>
>% gcc -v
>
>Reading specs from c:/djgpp/lib/gcc-lib/djgpp/3.21/specs
>Configured with: /devel/gnu/gcc/3.2/gnu/gcc-3.21/configure i586-pc-msdosdjgpp --prefix=/dev/env/DJDIR --disable-nls
>Thread model: single
>gcc version 3.2.1    // __GNUC__, __GNUC_MINOR__, __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__

So are you agreeing or disputing?  The above is clearly gcc 3.2.1.
Cygwin's version of gcc is 3.2 .

This isn't worth discussing.  We're not going to be putting the -x release
numbers into the gcc version string so let's all move along now.  One discussion
like this in a seven day period is enough.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]