This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: latest cygcheck -c is expensive
- From: "Wes Szumera" <wszumera at chartermi dot net>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 16:31:34 -0400
- Subject: Re: latest cygcheck -c is expensive
- References: <20030905124047.GD1852@tishler.net>
Date sent: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 11:07:29 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-rcm@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: latest cygcheck -c is expensive
Send reply to: cygwin@cygwin.com
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 08:40:47AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >Would you be willing to make the status check portion of cygcheck -c
> >optional (i.e., another option)? The latest version is very expensive:
> >
> > $ # 1.5.3 on P4 2.4 GHz
> > $ time cygcheck -c >/dev/null
> >
> > real 1m49.646s
> > user 0m0.010s
> > sys 0m0.020s
> >
> > $ # 1.3.22 on P3 500 MHz
> > $ time cygcheck -c >/dev/null
> >
> > real 0m0.042s
> > user 0m0.010s
> > sys 0m0.020s
>
> Why does it matter if cygcheck -c is expensive? It is supposed to be doing
> a sanity check on the installation.
>
> OTOH, it could probably be speeded up considerably if it used a mingw zlib
> library...
>
> cgf
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/