This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: cygkpathsea-3-3-7.dll (was Re: grep.exe - Unable to locate DLL)


On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Alex Vinokur wrote:

> "Alex Vinokur" wrote in message bk60un$p98$1@sea.gmane.org">news:bk60un$p98$1@sea.gmane.org...
> >
> > "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" wrote in message 87n0d5wwre.fsf@peder.flower">news:87n0d5wwre.fsf@peder.flower...
> > > Alex Vinokur writes:
> > >
> > > > $ cygcheck -c | grep tetex
> > > > tetex                   20020911-1         OK
> > > > tetex-bin               20020911-1         OK
> > >
> > > ... but you must have libkpathsea3*-2.0.x or something.  Very strange.
> > >
> > > The picture of your setup.exe suggests that the mirror that you use is
> > > very much out of date.  What mirror do you use?
> >
> > http://ftp.inf-tu.dresden.de  (See attachment).
> >
> [snip]
>
> It seems that http://ftp.inf-tu.dresden.de is OK.
> Perhaps it was my fault. Sorry.
>
> Now the problem with kpsewhich.exe (cygkpathsea-3-3-7) is solved.
>
> ------ BEGIN ------
> 1. I anew installed tetex, tetex-base, tetex-bin, tetex-devel which were
> downloaded from http://ftp.inf-tu.dresden.de .
>
> 2.
> $  cygcheck -c | grep tetex
> tetex                   2.0.2-12           OK
> tetex-base              2.0.2-12           Incomplete
> tetex-beta              20020911-1         OK
> tetex-bin               2.0.2-12           OK
> tetex-devel             2.0.2-12           OK
> tetex-doc               20020911-1         OK
> tetex-extra             20020911-1         OK
> tetex-tiny              20020911-1         Incomplete
> tetex-x11               20020911-1         OK
>
> $ cygcheck -cd | grep tetex
> tetex                   2.0.2-12
> tetex-base              2.0.2-12
> tetex-beta              20020911-1
> tetex-bin               2.0.2-12
> tetex-devel             2.0.2-12
> tetex-doc               20020911-1
> tetex-extra             20020911-1
> tetex-tiny              20020911-1
> tetex-x11               20020911-1
> [snip]

Three quick notes:

1) There is no reason to run *both* "cygcheck -c" and "cygcheck -cd" --
   the package version information will be absolutely the same.  The only
   difference is the integrity checking in "cygcheck -c".
2) Is there a particular reason why you didn't upgrade *all* of your tetex
   packages to the latest version?
3) I'd investigate the "Incomplete"s above -- "tetex-*" aren't supposed to
   have missing files.  The next step after seeing an "Incomplete" package
   is to run "cygcheck -cv" to see which files are considered missing (as
   suggested in <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-09/msg00969.html>).  If
   "cygcheck -c" erroneously reports some files as missing, I'd like to
   know about it.

Hope this helps,
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor@watson.ibm.com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]