Re: problems with current squid

[Tom Oehser <tom at toms dot net>]

It seems like the ./configure for squid incorrectly detects the number
available, it can't find the limit and sets it at the squid ./configure
maximum of 8192.  Something needs to be fixed in the ./configure test
that identifies how many fds are available so that it detects the real
number, or a special case needs to be added to ./configure so that it
won't try to set it to 8192.  -TOm


On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Robert Collins wrote:

> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:36:17 +1000
> From: Robert Collins <rbcollins@cygwin.com>
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: problems with current squid
>
> On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 18:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On
> > How big is squid trying to set RLIMIT_NOFILE?
>
> However big it suceeded when I built it. Squid saves the successful
> upper limit, and then uses that.
>
> >   I tried with a test
> > application and it failed to set the limit to more than 3200 entries.
> > YMMV since there's no fixed numbers of descriptors, only a fixed number
> > of bytes for a bunch of different jobs.
>
> Right, we'll need to rebuild squid to handle the lower level available
> in cygwin 1.5.
>
> Rob
> --
> GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.
>

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/