This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: cygwin copy problems usb 2.0


total commander is a clone of norton commander. something like midnight
commander on linux.

i thought the same: choice between usb 1.x and 2.0 is done far lower level
that cygwin can really influence it. but the difference of speed made me
consipicious.

example, copying a single file (.tar.gz) of size ~70MB:
with total commander it takes 20 sec.
with cygwin it takes 4 minutes (!), which is plain too long to include it in
my script.

i know through its abstracton layer cygwin must be slower. but regarding
that slowliness could it be another reason? 

thanks again!
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/cygwin-copy-problems-usb-2.0-tf2009189.html#a5525767
Sent from the Cygwin Users forum at Nabble.com.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]