This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: cygwin copy problems usb 2.0
total commander is a clone of norton commander. something like midnight
commander on linux.
i thought the same: choice between usb 1.x and 2.0 is done far lower level
that cygwin can really influence it. but the difference of speed made me
consipicious.
example, copying a single file (.tar.gz) of size ~70MB:
with total commander it takes 20 sec.
with cygwin it takes 4 minutes (!), which is plain too long to include it in
my script.
i know through its abstracton layer cygwin must be slower. but regarding
that slowliness could it be another reason?
thanks again!
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/cygwin-copy-problems-usb-2.0-tf2009189.html#a5525767
Sent from the Cygwin Users forum at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/