This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: more on Re: bash process substitution "<(list)" [spot the difference]
- From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:30:17 -0400
- Subject: Re: more on Re: bash process substitution "<(list)" [spot the difference]
- References: <465CE9DE.4030907@alumni.rice.edu>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
B. K. Oxley (binkley) wrote:
> I am exploring how process substitution works on Cygwin. I have scripts
> which run fine on Linux but not on Windows XP.
>
> Why does one of these scripts produce an error and the other does not?
>
> Script #1:
>
> $ cat a
> #!/bin/bash
>
> function f()
> {
> echo "$1"
> cat "$1"
> }
>
> f <(echo OK)
>
> $ ./a
> /proc/self/fd/63
> OK
>
> Script #2:
>
> $ cat b
> #!/bin/bash
>
> function f()
> {
> ls -l "$1"
> cat "$1"
> }
>
> f <(echo OK)
>
> $ ./b
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 luser None 0 May 29 15:49 /proc/self/fd/63 -> pipe:[1728]
> cat: /proc/self/fd/63: No such file or directory
With the exception of a slight bit of file name conversion, I get the same
result as you do with Cygwin when I run on Linux (FC4):
# /tmp/a
/dev/fd/63
OK
# /tmp/b
lr-x------ 1 lhall lhall 64 May 29 23:26 /dev/fd/63 -> pipe:[916212]
cat: /dev/fd/63: No such file or directory
This is using your scripts verbatim.
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746
_____________________________________________________________________
A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/