This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: complex number
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:22:56 +0200
- Subject: Re: complex number
- References: <432458.55204.qm@web25004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Apr 1 14:48, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>
> Dear All,
> I was trying to understand why this code
>
> #include <iostream>
> #include <complex>
>
> int main()
> {
> double a = 0;
> double b = 1. / a;
> a += 1;
> std::cout << std::abs (std::complex<double> (b, a)) << '\n';
> }
>
> produce Inf on most platform and NaN on cygwin.
That's the result of the newlib function which is defined as
double
cabs(z)
struct complex z;
{
return hypot(z.x, z.y);
}
> I found that newlib have the function cabs (complex absolute)
> but in cygwin the prototypes is
>
> extern double cabs();
The math.h header is from newlib as well. I don't know why the
math.h header is missing a normal prototype. I *assume* that nobody
ever made the effort to convert these old functions (cabs is from 1994)
to the ANSI C style. You should ask this question on the newlib list.
> so just a placeholder but not a useful function.
> There is any reason why cygwin is missing functional
> C99 complex functions ?
Sorry, it's all about newlib.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/