This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: dg-error vs. i18n?
- From: paul dot hermeneutic at gmail dot com
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 07:05:39 -0500
- Subject: Re: dg-error vs. i18n?
- References: <4AE235E4.2060005@gmail.com> <84fc9c000910231559y194a9ccfyfb9414f8ed04a361@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0910232305540.30905@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <4AE24BE4.8020207@gmail.com> <4AE281BC.1040200@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 23:25, Charles Wilson
<cygwin@cwilson.fastmail.fm> wrote:
> That's interesting. I had thought "ascii" was a fairly common encoding
> name; I know I've seen both 'encoding="ascii"' and 'encoding="us-ascii"'
> in XML documents. ÂMaybe we (cygwin) should add an explicit
> plain-old-ascii encoding name?
For XML, the list of encoding values is specified by IANA.
http://www.iana.org/assignments/character-sets
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple