This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Cygwin's GCC doesn't like this .sa_handler initialization for some reason

From: Eric Blake <eblake at redhat dot com>
To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:20:00 -0600
Subject: Re: Cygwin's GCC doesn't like this .sa_handler initialization for some reason
References: <20100425113232.GA11541@sbox> <4BD5C311.2060708@redhat.com> <4BD5E165.6070907@gmail.com> <20100427090516.GA12365@calimero.vinschen.de> <4BD6ED8A.4080403@redhat.com> <20100427140619.GI1845@calimero.vinschen.de>

On 04/27/2010 08:06 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> And while we're touching the file, we probably want to do similar
>> treatment for struct siginfo_t: si_tid, si_overrun, si_sigval, si_value,
>> si_status, si_utime, si_stime, and si_addr.
> 
> Does "we" mean you're going to provide a patch?

Yes.  Patch coming up shortly.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake@redhat.com    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cygwin's GCC doesn't like this .sa_handler initialization for some reason
  - From: Christopher Faylor

References:
- Re: Cygwin's GCC doesn't like this .sa_handler initialization for some reason
  - From: Eric Blake
- Re: Cygwin's GCC doesn't like this .sa_handler initialization for some reason
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: Cygwin's GCC doesn't like this .sa_handler initialization for some reason
  - From: Corinna Vinschen
- Re: Cygwin's GCC doesn't like this .sa_handler initialization for some reason
  - From: Eric Blake
- Re: Cygwin's GCC doesn't like this .sa_handler initialization for some reason
  - From: Corinna Vinschen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]