This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Re[2]: Slow fork issue - Win x64
- From: Nicole Hamilton <hamilton at hamiltonlabs dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 12:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: Re[2]: Slow fork issue - Win x64
- References: <1613876000.20080917204140@F1-Photo.com> <COL101-W1796553906F07DD5A0E579E64F0@phx.gbl> <1542859895.20080918134643@F1-Photo.com> <21561482.post@talk.nabble.com> <27607447.post@talk.nabble.com>
Jarkko HÃkkinen wrote:
>
> I'm getting rather similar results on my Cygwin 1.7.1, Windows 7 as
> evidenced by the figures below.
> :
>
> [13:41:50 ~]$ while (true); do date; done | uniq -c
> 5 Tue Feb 16 14:00:09 FLEST 2010
> 7 Tue Feb 16 14:00:10 FLEST 2010
> 9 Tue Feb 16 14:00:11 FLEST 2010
> 9 Tue Feb 16 14:00:12 FLEST 2010
>
Oh, my. Here's what I get with 64-bit Hamilton C shell on Windows 7 on a
2.67GHz Core i7:
10 C% date +"%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Z %Y"
Sun Oct 10 12:03:31 PDT 2010
11 C% while (1) !!; end | uniq -c
while ( 1 ) date +"%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Z %Y" ; end | uniq -c
164 Sun Oct 10 12:03:51 PDT 2010
170 Sun Oct 10 12:03:52 PDT 2010
169 Sun Oct 10 12:03:53 PDT 2010
169 Sun Oct 10 12:03:54 PDT 2010
Here's what I get on a MacBook with a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo, again running
64-bit code on Win7:
8 C% while ( 1 ) date +"%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Z %Y" ; end | uniq -c
17 Sun Oct 10 12:17:21 PDT 2010
84 Sun Oct 10 12:17:22 PDT 2010
77 Sun Oct 10 12:17:23 PDT 2010
78 Sun Oct 10 12:17:24 PDT 2010
But this is running native, using threads instead of a fork emulation.
Regards,
Nicole
Full disclosure: I wrote the Hamilton C shell.
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Slow-fork-issue---Win-x64-tp19538601p29929206.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple